Back to Tutorials
Position, support, engage
A Discussion response looks like a forum post but is graded like a mini-essay. Here's the shape, worked through with a real professor's question and 2 real classmate posts.
What the task gives you
A professor's question, plus 2 classmate posts already responding — 10 minutes to add your own.
Real prompt
Professor Kim "Should universities require a financial literacy course before graduating?"
Diego "I agree — graduates don't know how to budget or manage debt."
Priya "Not sure — students are busy, and it can be self-taught."
Position: sentence 1
No summary, no recap of the classmates — just say what you think, immediately.
"I agree that universities should require a financial literacy course before graduation."
Reason + example
Not "because it's important" — a specific, developed reason. This is the elaboration actually being scored.
"It's important for students to understand money." — too vague
"Many students graduate without ever learning how credit cards, interest, or loan repayment work — a gap that can cause real financial harm in their first few years out of school."
Engage a classmate
Name them, and respond to their actual point — the piece that's easiest to forget (next tutorial is all about why it matters).
"As Priya points out, financial literacy can be self-taught — but most students never seek it out unless it's required, which is exactly why I'd make the course mandatory."
DEB
4 things to know about the Discussion structure
Audio: DEB (ElevenLabs)